Become an UnexplainedEarth
member for just $2.99 and read the expanded version
of this report that includes high-resolution photos and
directions to the site.
UnexplainedEarth members
can also read Part 3 of this report right now.
For less than half the cost of an issue of most magazines,
UnexplainedEarth members have access to exclusive reports,
the Unexplained Sites Database, Members Only Trip Notes
and many other
benefits of
membership, so
sign up today!
With my first two days on
Easter Island behind me, I decided I had explored as
far as my feet would take me and it was time to rent a car.
Shopping around turned out to be pointless as most places
seemed to have similar 1980’s Hyundai Sidekicks for
the same price. I searched in vain for one with an automatic
transmission but was told that there were no automatics
on the whole island. Reluctantly I slid behind the wheel
of my chosen Hyundai and tried to remember how to work a
clutch. Luckily, Easter Island has no traffic lights and
only a couple of stop signs so it makes for a pretty relaxing
place to get re-acquainted with driving stick. After a few
embarrassing lurches and stalls, I was in gear and on my
way out of town to my first stop, Vinapu.

One of Thor Heyerdahl’s most visually compelling
arguments for a Pre-Incan presence on Easter Island can
be found at the superbly constructed stone platform known
as Ahu Vinapu. Countless visitors have remarked on its shocking
similarity to the great cyclopean stone walls found around
Cuzco, Peru. Heyerdahl states that “Vinapu alone stands
as a mirrored reflection of the classical masterpieces of
the Incas or their predecessors.”1
World traveler and writer David Childress remarked on further
similarities between the two architectural styles.
Walking around the platform I thought back to my own time
at Cuzco just weeks before. I had seen many examples of
the knobs Childress refers to and they are visually very
distinctive and hard to miss. Some examples of the stone
knobs I saw in
Peru
can be seen in the photo on the right. After twenty minutes
of searching I could find nothing at Vinapu that resembled
the protrusions so common in Cuzco, especially in the southeast
corner of the wall. Because these knobs are so unique, the
existence of one at Vinapu would provide compelling evidence
for the influence or Peruvian architects on Easter Island
in ancient times. I was a bit disappointed that I couldn’t
relocate whatever Childress had seen 20 years before.
Even without the stone knobs, at first glance, the masonry
does look almost identical to Incan architecture. The large
stones along the face are precisely fitted together using
no mortar. The entire structure also has a slightly rounded
shape and across the face and each individual stone is slightly
convex or pillow-shaped. Incorporating beveled stones like
these was another signature of Incan construction.
However, orthodox researchers point out that a closer inspection
of the site shows some flaws in Heyerdahl’s logic.
The greatest Incan walls were built of large boulders of
various shapes superbly fitted together so that not even
a thin blade could be inserted between them.
But
the wall at Vinapu simply gives a similar illusion. The
large stones on the outside are merely a cosmetic facing
for an interior filled with rubble. Closer inspection renders
the similarity of the sites to be largely superficial.
Skeptics of a Peruvian influence at Vinapu also point out
that the superb construction in evidence at this site is
unique on the island, rather than being the norm. However,
when Captain Cook arrived on Rapa Nui, he described the
existence of another platform similar to Vinapu in Hanga
Roa.1 Unfortunately this ahu
was dismantled so that its stones could be used in the construction
of a harbor. Since it was taken apart before it could be
properly studied, most researchers choose to ignore its
existence.
Another ahu with stonework resembling that found
at Vinapu was documented by William Thomson in 1886. Along
the north coast he described and sketched a platform called
Ahu Ahau that has since fallen into the sea.1
Lastly, while conducting excavations at Anakena beach in
1987, Thor Heyerdahl’s team unearthed another finely-constructed
massive stone wall just beneath the surface.1
While
still available to researchers, no follow-up digs have occurred
to further explore the underground ruins at Anakena.
So certainly in ancient times, the fine construction in
evidence at Ahu Vinapu was not unique. Unfortunately most
of the stone walls to which it could be best compared are
no longer in existence or visible. Whether or not Vinapu
genuinely represents a South American influence on Easter
Island is a point that will no doubt continue to be debated.
After marveling at the fine stone work, I climbed back
into my jeep and continued east stopping at several platforms
and moai until I reached Ahu Hanga Te’e.
From a distance this ahu didn’t seem to be
particularly impressive as all the moai that once
stood atop it now lay face down. But a walk around the site
revealed a number of interesting features. The generally
accepted chronology for stone carving on the island identifies
the earliest moai as those with rounded bald heads,
while later moai were carved with flat heads to
allow a topknot or pukao to be placed on top.
These
topknots were carved from a soft red scoria and increased
the height of moai that were already being carved
larger and larger.
Around Hanga Te’e a variety of pukao lay
strewn about. Some even featured deep petroglyphs and designs.
As I got closer to the platform, I noticed another curious
feature. Just in front of the ahu in the ceremonial
center was a ring of stones 60 feet across with a single
larger stone marking the center. At one time these stone
rings were quite common on Easter Island, but now only a
few examples remain. Early accounts tell how the islanders
used the stones ceremonially to track the position of the
sun, the moon and the stars.4
How exactly this was accomplished and interpreted is no
longer known.
As the sun fell lower in the sky I decided I could make
it to one more major site and continued east towards the
largest stone platform on the island, Ahu Tongariki. Measuring
almost 700 feet across, this great stone platform is an
imposing sight. Atop it sit 15 carefully placed moai
varying in height from 17 to 26 feet and weighing an average
of 40 tons. Tongariki suffered a near disaster in 1960 when
an earthquake off the coast of Chili generated a
25
foot tidal wave that swept ashore reducing the ahu
to rubble and scattering the statues more than 400 feet
inland. An intense restoration project in 1990 restored
the platform to its former glory.2
Currently no other ahu supports more statues,
but during Thomson’s stay in 1886 he documented an
ahu on an inaccessible terrace along the coast
east of Rano Kau that supported an impressive 16 statues.
Unfortunately, as with Ahu Ahau, this platform also succumbed
to the sea as the fragile volcanic cliff it was built upon
was slowly undercut by the relentless waves below.1
In fact a number of the island’s most mysterious and
perhaps most ancient sites have been lost to the ocean in
just the last hundred years. Now smothered in the waves
below, we’ll never know what secrets these unique
sites once held.
The next morning I visited the birthplace of most of the
great statues on the island. I steered my jeep to a stop
next to the only other car in the parking lot and made my
way along the trail up the slopes of Ranu Raraku. The soft
volcanic tuft of this long extinct volcano provided perfect
working material to carve the vast majority of the moai
found around the island. So far, 887 moai have
been counted on Easter Island and of these, all but 55 were
carved from the slope before me. In fact, the statues were
carved in such abundance that almost 400 moai still
surround the slopes or lay in various stages of completion
and never made it to a coastal ahu for display.
As the carving of the moai continued through the
years, the stone monuments were made to be larger and larger.
Still attached to the quarry is a moai of truly
astounding proportions. Known as El Gigante (The Giant)
it measures almost 72 feet in length and is estimated to
weigh almost 300 tons.
If
it had ever been completed, and a topknot placed on top,
El Gigante would have stood taller than an 8-story building.
Walking along the length of this massive carving I pondered
the question that has intrigued and perplexed all who visit
Easter Island. How were the moai transported to
their ahu? The largest moai ever to be
placed on a platform stood over 32 feet high and weighed
around 80 tons. The question of how such colossal monuments
could be transported over as many as 12 miles of rugged
terrain has been the subject of much speculation throughout
the years.
Eric Von Daniken suggested extraterrestrials with anti-gravity
technology as the most likely explanation, but it’s
hardly necessary to resort to such far-out speculation.
Some have theorized that in the days when trees could still
be found on the island, the trunks were used as rollers
to ease the transport of the moai. Others have
suggested that the ground was greased with a mixture of
vegetable products and that the moai were then
dragged to their ahu on sleds.2
Neither of these explanations is completely satisfying though.
Throughout the centuries, the native population has stuck
to a single story. They describe how the chief would use
his mana or spiritual power to command the statues
to walk to their desired locations. Most researchers dismiss
these claims, but in 1986 Thor Heyerdahl was able to recreate
a walking movement
using
two teams of islanders controlling ropes attached to a moai.
By pulling back and forth on the ropes, the teams were able
to “walk” the statue forward by tilting it side
to side.1
However, recent excavations along the ancient roads that
radiate out from Ranu Raraku have cast further doubt on
how that moai were moved. Sections of the road
were found to be broad and flat, suitable for “walking”
a statue or using rollers. But other sections were V-shaped,
rendering most transportation methods suggested thus far
impossible.2 The roads also
traveled up and down slopes and did not lead all the way
to the platforms that were the moais’ final
destination. The mystery of the monuments’ transport
still remains unsolved but new developments may bring us
closer to the real answer.
I followed the branching path to the left and climbed up
a narrow gap into the interior of the crater. Dotting the
slope, surrounding the banks of a fresh water lake, over
a hundred stone faces basked in the sunlight buried up to
their necks in eroded soil and volcanic chunks dislodged
from the cliffs above. Hundreds of years ago, as the environment
collapsed, water sources dried up, leaving the lake before
me as one of the few remaining locations with fresh water.
Along the banks of this valuable resource, a thick crop
of totora reeds have been a point of contention for over
50 years.
Thor
Heyerdahl claimed that the reeds were identical to those
found at Lake Titicaca in the Andes, and must have been
imported by the earliest South American settlers. However,
pollen analysis carried out by John Flenley in the 1980’s
clearly showed that the reeds have grown in the lake for
over 30,000 years and thus made their way to the island
by natural means.2
As I walked around the edge of the lake, I took a moment
to examine one of the stone faces along the path. The moai
found at Ranu Raraku have a unique appearance in that they
have no eyes. Instead the giants were completed and polished
in every other way, but the eye sockets were carved last,
etched out only once a moai had reached its designated
ahu.
It was long believed that the great statues on Easter Island
had no real eyes, but in 1978, native archaeologist Sonia
Haoa discovered fragments of coral and red scoria that exactly
matched the eye sockets of a statue above.2
The discovery that the moai did in fact have inlaid
eyes proved shocking to many researchers as this practice
was not a Polynesian custom. The practice was common in
many other ancient cultures however, including those from
the Middle East and Central and South America.1
As I continued along the shore I thought about all the
conflicting evidence I had seen so far. Mainstream archaeologists
insist on a purely Polynesian heritage for the original
population of Easter Island. But the artifacts and sites
Thor Heyerdahl and others had documented seemed to paint
a very different picture. In the days ahead I would continue
to discover that Easter Island’s history is a complex
puzzle with no easy solutions.
Become an UnexplainedEarth member
and read Part 3 of this report today!
Become an UnexplainedEarth
member for just $2.99 and read the expanded version
of this report that includes high-resolution photos and
directions to the site.
UnexplainedEarth members
can also read Part 3 of this report right now.
For less than half the cost of an issue of most magazines,
UnexplainedEarth members have access to exclusive reports,
the Unexplained Sites Database, Members Only Trip Notes
and many other
benefits of
membership, so
sign up today!
Share your thoughts on Easter Island at the UnexplainedEarth
Forums!